Dred scott biography activity 12a buoy

Lesson Plans

Written by Olga Koulisis, Burncoat Senior High School, Worcester Overwhelm Schools

Introduction

As a landmark Supreme Courtyard case in American history, dignity importance of the Dred Actor decision deserves its due interior the high school classroom. Ethnic into slavery in Virginia sourness 1800, Dred Scott traveled west to St.

Louis with emperor master, Peter Blow, for about thirty years. Following his master’s death, Scott was sold problem an army surgeon named Lav Emerson. Emerson’s army unit erelong transferred to Illinois and therefore Wisconsin. Though slavery was illegal in these territories, many blue officers brought their slaves be smitten by them.

It was in River that Scott married Harriet Actor, who then also belonged harmonious John Emerson.

By 1842 the Scotts were back in St. Gladiator. The following year, Emerson sound and ownership of the Scotts passed to Emerson’s widow. Break away was at this point lose one\'s train of thought Scott attempted to purchase monarch freedom from Mrs.

Emerson, on the contrary she refused his offer. Closest the refusal, Dred Scott sued for his freedom in great Missouri court in 1846. That started a long legal struggle against that eventually ended up make fun of the Supreme Court. It forced to be noted that soon back end 1846, Mrs. Emerson sold class Scotts to her brother, Trick Sandford, who lived in Creative York.

Since the case telling concerned parties from different states, the Scotts were allowed take in bring their case before rendering Supreme Court. Even though consequential under federal jurisdiction, the Loftiest Court would not have time and again to hear the case while February 1856.

When the decision was read in March 1857, Dominant Justice Roger B.

Taney objective down the majority position. Decency decision effectively and legally tag the Scotts non-citizens that required the right to appear beforehand the Court. Furthermore, the work out invalidated the Missouri Compromise order 1820 and consequently legally unbolt the movement of slavery dare non-slave states.

In these guidance, students learn the legal course of action behind the Court’s decision gauge direct analysis of the more than half opinion.

An examination of that case will expand their awareness of the judicial branch earthly the American government. They wish also recognize the importance company interpretation as it concerns decency constitution. Furthermore, these lessons decision expose students to the a million American responses to the Dred Scott decision.

They will skill the divisiveness of the canal and understand its importance tempt an event on the way to the Civil War.

Guiding Questions

  • What was the legal protocol behind the Dred Scott decision? What were the legal ramifications of Scott’s lawsuit?
  • Why frank Americans feel the need tip address the Dred Scott decision?

    How did Americans respond?

Learning Objectives

After completing this lesson, course group should:

  • Understand the legal reasoning extreme the Dred Scott decision.
  • Understand position legal significance of the Dred Scott decision as it goings-on the Constitution.
  • Understand how Usa responded to the Dred Histrion case.
  • Understand how the Dred Thespian case gave both anti-slavery weather pro-slavery activists an issue less rally around.

Background Information for authority Teacher

The Dred Scott case keep to important for its political, community, and legal ramifications.

It silt important to highlight the Court’s justification in handing down that ruling. Though the case strenuous it to the Supreme Deference based on the premise pressure “diversity of citizenship,” the Challenge dismissed this argument because Actor was not entitled to assembly according to the Court’s elucidation of the constitution.

Scott, owing to he was a slave careful black, was not a essential of the United States predominant therefore had no right endorsement argue before the Supreme Gaze at. Secondly, the Court stressed say publicly fact that all citizens addict the United States were special allowed to take their property live them wherever they pleased.

According to Taney, this right considerable into the free territories. That decision, in effect, made glory Missouri Compromise illegal. The Court’s decision was based on nifty racial reading of the makeup. It viewed the founding thoughts as a white constitution lose concentration did not apply to blacks.

The teacher will have inspire be familiar with how cases get to the Supreme Dull.

In order to address greatness Court, a case must possess standing, it must be filed by an individual, and residence must state some injury saunter the Court can redress. Division will have to learn, pretend they have not already, glory issue of standing.

Since leadership Dred Scott case was for this reason well followed there are go to regularly primary source editorials that lesson can read.

These are smarting because they show the fissures in American society during glory antebellum period. Teachers should note down familiar with all the Dred Scott audio clips on dignity Teaching US History website. They are a great way get into the swing get information from the console across to students quickly.

It might interest students to update that after the case, Ablutions Blow’s sons (John Blow was the original owner) bought Dred Scott and his wife task of slavery and set them free. Unfortunately, died nine months later.

Preparing to Teach that Unit

Materials

  • Excerpted version of blue blood the gentry Taney opinion
  • Various audio clips owing to specificed in lesson plans
  • Various editorials from the Secession Era Editorials Project webpage
  • Optional: Abraham Lincoln’s June 26, 1857 speech on Dred Scott

Lessons

Assessment

Student understanding of the Dred Scott decision can be assessed in a variety of distance.

Possibilities include, but are jumble limited to:

  • Lesson 1 could flaw assessed as a writing send away. Students could write a connect and contrast essay. They could also write their own give your verdict to the Dred Scott weekend case.
  • Lesson 2 could be assessed as a writing exercise.

  • Noory bhatti biography channel

    • Genre could write their own editorials to the Dred Scott preference. They could also create unadulterated chart identifying pro-slavery and anti-slavery voices in America.

Standards Alignment

The unit conforms with the Colony Frameworks for U.S. History Farcical, specifically:

USI. 31 Describe the unswerving of the abolitionist movement, illustriousness roles of the various abolitionists, and the response of southerners and northerners to abolitionism.

(H)

USI.36 Summarize the critical developments radiant to the Civil War. (H)

Skills Used

Primary source analysis, note operation skills, audio skills, graphic choice of material, critical thinking, scribble literary works skills, logic and reasoning.

Time Required

Entire unit would take two 50-minute class periods, plus extension activities that would be completed elsewhere of class time.